|
Conyers Kennel
Club Newsletter
Officers
Board Members
President – Don Watson Anne Crum
Vice President – Randall McCurry Mike Shelton
Treasurer – Rhea Spence Audrey Lycan
Secretary – Jerri Dandelske
Merry Carol
Houchard
AKC Delegate – Mike Houchard
Renae Watson

January
2010 Newsletter
Hello Everyone and Welcome to the Conyers Kennel Club Newsletter. Things will
be back on track this month and we will meet at IHOP in
Conyers on the second Monday of the month which is January 11, 2010 at 6:30pm to
eat and the meeting usually starts around 7:30pm.
We all had a good time at the Christmas party with the gift exchange and we
enjoyed the good food.
Since we didn’t have a regular meeting there will be no minutes in this
newsletter. The election of officers and board members was
discussed. There were no nominations from the floor so the panel stands as
below.
OFFICERS:
President - Don Watson
Vice President - Randall McCurry
Treasurer - Rhea Spence
Secretary - Jerri Dandelske
AKC Delegate - Mike Houchard
BOARD MEMBERS:
Anne Crum
Merry Carol Houchard
Mike Shelton
Renae Watson
Jan Moore*
One of our new members, Steve Donahue, suggested a fun field day. I look
forward to this and I am sure many of you look forward to this
as well. I will get the details out as soon as he gives me the information on
this.
The Cherokee Rose Cluster show is February 5th, 6th, & 7th. Our day
is Saturday the 6th.
I will send out a separate e-mail to let everyone know when to meet for set up.
If you haven’t paid your club dues for 2010, don’t forget. I will get a new
list of club member phone numbers out by March 1st.
There will be a Cluster Meeting January 12th, 2010 at 7:30pm. at the
Lawrenceville Presbyterian Church , 800 Lawrenceville Hwy.,
Lawrenceville, Ga. All officers and board members are expected to attend.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Canine Health
Foundation News Alert (1)
American
Kennel Club and Canine Health Foundation Release Podcast about Responsible
Breeding Practices
[Thursday,
December 17, 2009]
The
American Kennel Club and the Canine Health Foundation are pleased to debut the
next podcast in the Genome Barks series.
This week we welcome Dr. Jerold Bell, the Director of Clinical Veterinary
Genetics Course at the Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine. In this
interview,
Dr. Bell
discusses why genetic testing is important, describes the different types of
genetic tests and how to best use the test results.
The Genome Barks podcast series features lectures from the highly
successful AKC-CHF Breeders Symposia and provides responsible breeders and pet
owners
an inside
look at the work being done by the AKC and the Canine Health Foundation.
New podcasts are released every two weeks and can be accessed from either
the American Kennel Club website at www.akc.org or the Canine Health Foundation
website at
www.caninehealthfoundation.org - click on "Podcasts." They are also available on
Apple's iTunes® or directly at
www.genomebarks.com.
Clubs are encouraged to add the Genome Barks Podcast link to their home
pages. Contact the Canine Health Foundation to obtain graphics and links.
Canine Health
Foundation News Alert (2)
American
Kennel Club and Canine Health Foundation Release Podcast about Nutrition for
Chronically Ill Dogs
[Thursday, December 17, 2009]
The
American Kennel Club and the Canine Health Foundation are pleased to debut the
next podcast in the Genome Barks series.
This week we welcome Dr. Kathy Michel, Associate Professer of Veterinary
Nutrition at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine. A
Diplomate
of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition, Dr. Michel discusses
therapeutic diets, feeding dogs with illness and other topics useful
for
dogs with health challenges.
The Genome Barks podcast series features lectures from the highly
successful AKC-CHF Breeders Symposia and provides responsible breeders and pet
owners
an inside
look at the work being done by the AKC and the Canine Health Foundation.
New podcasts are released every two weeks and can be accessed from either
the American Kennel Club website at www.akc.org or the Canine Health Foundation
website at
www.caninehealthfoundation.org - click on "Podcasts." They are also available on
Apple's iTunes® or directly at
www.genomebarks.com.
Clubs are encouraged to add the Genome Barks Podcast link to their home
pages. Contact the Canine Health Foundation to obtain graphics and links.
Canine Health
Foundation News Alert (3)
American
Kennel Club and Canine Health Foundation Release Podcast about Bartonella
Infection
[Thursday, December 31, 2009]
The
American Kennel Club and the Canine Health Foundation are pleased to debut the
next podcast in the Genome Barks series.
This week, we welcome Dr. Ed Breitschwerdt, a specialist in internal
medicine and infectious disease at North Carolina State University. Dr.
Breitschwerdt has
received
funding from the Canine Health Foundation for various infectious diseases
including Bartonella spp. In this podcast, Dr. Breitschwerdt describes
Bartonella,
explains what clinical signs to look for in a potentially ill animal, and also
discusses the various research projects underway.
The Genome Barks podcast series features lectures from the highly
successful AKC-CHF Breeders Symposia and provides responsible breeders and pet
owners an
inside look at the work being done by the AKC and the Canine Health Foundation.
New podcasts are released every two weeks and can be accessed from either
the American Kennel Club website at www.akc.org or the Canine Health
Foundation
website at www.caninehealthfoundation.org - click on "Podcasts." They are also
available on Apple's iTunes® or directly at
www.genomebarks.com.
Clubs are encouraged to add the Genome Barks Podcast link to their home
pages. Contact the Canine Health Foundation to obtain graphics and links.
Click
here to listen to the podcasts.
Click
here to support important research at the Canine Health Foundation and please
consider a recurring gift.
Contact:
Erika Werne
Director of Education & Communications
Canine Health Foundation
919-334-4010
888-682-9696
www.caninehealthfoundation.org
888-682-9696
www.caninehealthfoundation.org
AKC
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
-- AKC's 125th Anniversary Filled with Celebrations --
New York, NY - Our anniversary year has been filled with
celebration, the marking of milestones, and new opportunities.
In 1884, the AKC began its all-breed purebred dog registry with
just 9 breeds. As of December 30, we will recognize 164 breeds with the addition
of the Bluetick
Coonhound, Boykin Spaniel and Redbone Coonhound.
In addition to AKC holding several press conferences tied to our
anniversary, the AKC Publications department dedicated the entire September
issue of the AKC
Gazette, which has been the 'Official Journal for the Sport of Purebred Dogs'
since 1889, to the anniversary. We have also chronicled our accomplishments in
Dogs:
The First 125 Years of the American Kennel Club, an update to the well-known AKC
Sourcebook last printed in 1984.
One of our most exciting events and another wonderful way to
commemorate our 125th year was the first stand-alone Meet the Breeds event
organized by the
AKC and Cat Fanciers' Association, and presented by Pet Partners, Inc.
We've celebrated our companion and performance events, hosting the
National Retriever Championships just a few weeks ago, the biannual National
Tracking
Invitational at a brand-new location, and the ever-popular National Agility
Championships. And not to forget that the team we sent to the World Agility
Championships in Austria this September returned home with two silver medals!
Also in 2009, the Obama family finally got their dog - a Portuguese
Water Dog named "Bo." The Portuguese Water Dog Club of America and the AKC PR
department worked closely to make this an opportunity to educate the public
about the breed, purebred dogs, and responsible breeders.
The AKC started the public conversation and followed the "Obama
Dog" campaign from President Obama's first mention of a possible dog all the way
through to
Bo's arrival. Their work on this campaign helped them win many local and
national PR awards and keep the AKC and purebred dogs front-and-center with pet
owners.
Finally, we began looking to the AKC's next 125 years with the
creation of several new programs. We launched our S.T.A.R puppy program, a
precursor to our
popular AKC Canine Good Citizen test, which will get puppies and their new
owners off to a good start.
The Canine Health & Welfare Advisory Panel was created and has met
several times to review public perceptions on this topic and to ensure that AKC
has access
to the insight and information that will allow us to continue leading the
dialogue when it comes to enhancing and protecting canine health and welfare.
The AKC Canine Partners program also launched this year and has
already listed more than 1,300 dogs. Beginning in April 2010, more than 300 AKC
clubs will
be hosting stand-alone obedience, agility or rally events open to mixed breeds.
Beyond the competitions, millions of additional dog owners we may
never have reached will be able to access a myriad of AKC resources and services
bringing
together like-minded people who share our passion for dogs and our commitment to
responsible dog ownership.
This has been an historic year of great achievement and progress
for the American Kennel Club. In addition, I'm happy to report that despite the
current economic
climate, our preliminary numbers show that we will have a reasonable operating
profit for the year, in addition to record-breaking investment results.
Once again, I want to thank all of you for your support as we look
forward to another 125 years of history as "the dog's champion."
Sincerely, Ron Menaker
Chairman

Do you have a win photo that
you want the dog world to see?
Send it to us now.
We'll email it to over 100,000 judges, handlers, agents and fellow exhibitors.
Be a part of the first
official AKC Weekly Wins Gallery email.
Publicize your wins, share your pride and make a splash in the first
edition of this weekly digital media showcase. Never before has there been a way
to reach the fancy
so quickly and with such visual impact.
|
 |
|
Example of Standard Listing |
Each standard listing includes a jumbo color photo of your win shot, plus
captions including dog's registered and call
names, breed, owner(s) name, handler, show date,
judge and even a live link to your web site. See the sample format at right.
Your actual listing will be enlarged to fill the
computer screen.
Be among the first 20 submissions for this first big email
blast and qualify for the low, low introductory rate of just $395.
That's far less than a penny
per email. Compare that to print advertising where you'd pay
more, reach far fewer people
and usually take weeks to appear.
It's easy to participate. Just click the Weekly Wins Gallery
order form
HERE, or call me, Samantha Smith, directly at
212-696-8259 so I can personally be of assistance to you.
The deadline for our special First Edition is Tuesday,
January 5 at 3 PM eastern time. You'll be in the big email blast
scheduled for Wednesday, January 6.
Don't miss out. Call 212-696-8259 or email me today at
winshot@akc.org.

The next articles were submitted by Audrey Lycan
EXCELLENT ARTICLE ON DEFINITION OF "PUPPY MILL".
Subject: An Obituary for Words
A SAOVA message to sportsmen, pet owners and farmers concerned about protecting their traditions, avocations and livelihoods from
anti-hunting, anti-breeding, animal guardianship advocates. Forwarding and cross posting, with attribution, encouraged.
From: Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA)
SAOVA Friends,
skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Once again Cindy Cooke, Legislative Specialist, is right on target with this
essay. Cindy notes that our acceptance of the animal rightist term
puppy mill was a mistake and "it’s rapidly becoming fatal today." I recently
attended an HSUS Lobby Seminar where the HSUS Director used
the terms commercial breeder and puppy mill interchangeably, and stated that
anyone with more than 6 dogs or who bred more than one/two
litters a year was a commercial breeder/puppymill.
Even if you have read this article in UKC’s
Coonhound Bloodlines
it is worth reading one more time.
Issue lobbying and working to identify and elect supportive legislators
An Obituary for Words
by
Cindy Cooke,
Legislative Specialist
You can't really ban a word. In fact, an attempt to ban something often
backfires, particularly in the United States, where we don't like people
censoring our speech. So I'm not going to tell you not to say "puppy mill".
I'm going to give you some very good reasons for not using that phrase.
I speak to a lot of dog clubs and frequently hear
dog breeders supporting so-called
"anti-puppy-mill" laws. When I ask these people to define
"puppy mill," invariably the definitions given include:
§
People who "overbreed" their dogs;
§
People who don't take care of their dogs;
§
People who have too many dogs;
§
People who breed dogs "just for money"; and
§
People who don't take health issues into account when breeding their dogs.
Let's look at these definitions in turn. What is "overbreeding"? In the wild,
most canids can only reproduce once a year. Most domestic dogs can
have two litters a year. When I first became a dog
breeder, it was almost a religious belief that no female dog should be
bred more than once a
year. We were told that it was important to "rest" the uterus between
litters. Today, however, thanks to advances in veterinary medicine, we
know that a uterus is actually damaged by the elevated progesterone levels that
occur in each heat cycle, whether the dog is pregnant or not.
Veterinary reproduction specialists recommend that dogs be bred on their second
or third heat cycle, that we do more back-to-back breedings,
and
that we spay the dogs at around age six.
The "overbreeding" argument also treats reproduction as
something that female dogs wouldn't do if they had a choice. Dogs aren't people
-
female dogs actually want to be bred when they're in heat and, with few
exceptions, enjoy raising their puppies. It's not an unwelcome event for
dogs.
People who don't take care of their dogs are already guilty
of a crime in all 50 states. There is nowhere in the United States where it is
legal to
neglect or abuse dogs. Sadly, a small minority of all dog breeders - commercial,
home and hobby - commit neglect and abuse. Some of these
do so out of ignorance, some out of laziness, and some out of meanness. All are
already breaking the law. It just needs to be enforced.
One of our biggest problems now is that animal radicals
insist that every dog be raised like a hothouse flower. One bill proposed this
year would
have required every kennel to be air conditioned. Many owners of
working dogs prefer that their dogs be
acclimated to hot weather so that they
can work when the temperature goes up. Likewise, sled dogs in the north often
sleep outdoors in the snow. Dogs can live and thrive in a wide
range of environments. The Arctic Circle, the jungles of Africa, and the deserts
of Arabia have all produced breeds of dogs that
can live happily
in
conditions that might not suit all dogs. It is important that we not let
activists redefine the needs of dogs to the extent that we are forced to
provide a brass bed and a down pillow for every animal in the kennel!
What is "too many" dogs? Most of our breeds were developed by wealthy people who
kept large numbers of dogs. Hound breeders traditionally
kept good-sized packs, and early show breeders did as well. Now that our sport
includes more mainstream people - people with jobs or people
who
need jobs - it's hard for many of us to keep large numbers of dogs. There is no
inherent link between numbers of dogs and neglect. People
who
have the resources to keep big kennels provide a service for all of us,
particularly if they maintain a good number of useful stud dogs.
Breeding dogs is expensive, and getting more so daily. It's
just plain silly to pretend that none of us needs the money generated by puppy
sales
and
stud services. Without that income, the vast majority of middle class breeders
could not afford this sport. When our sport was solely in the
hands of rich people, it was the norm to sneer at people in "trade", and part of
that attitude was handed down to us with the culture of our sport.
Today, however, the majority of us in the sport are "in trade", in the sense
that we have to work to support ourselves. Our dogs must, at least in
part, support themselves or most of us would have to get out of the game.
We have among us a small but vociferous group of people who
think that breeders only care about producing great hunting or
show dogs, and
nothing about health. In fact, I've never met a breeder who wasn't concerned
about the health of his dogs and the health of his breed. Most health
problems in dogs don't have simple solutions, so it is only natural that
breeders are often going to disagree about how to address health problems.
When there's no right answer to a question, then breeders who follow a different
path than you might choose are not necessarily wrong or
unconcerned. I know that many believe that commercial breeders don't care about
health, but the fact is that their professional organizations
provide some of the most sophisticated health seminars in the country for their
breeders.
Twenty years ago, animal activists created the phrase "puppy
mill". Back then, it was only applied to commercial breeders, and then only to
those
who were breaking the law by neglecting their dogs. In a futile attempt to
placate activists, many hobby breeders adopted the term "puppy mill"
and
used it to separate "them" from "us". It was a mistake then, and it's rapidly
becoming fatal today. Every one of these so-called
"anti-puppy-mill"
bills has a definition that could easily include breeders of hunting and show
dogs. Every time you use that phrase, you're
contributing to the idea that dog breeders need to be regulated out of
existence.
The message we need to send to America is that purebred dogs
are good, not just because they have pedigrees, but because of their
predictability, and that people should shop at least as carefully for a puppy as
they do for a car. We don't need to help the animal radicals spread
their message by using their favorite term: puppy mill.
http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/Articles/LegislativeUpdate06012009
The message above was posted to North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida,Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and Kentucky residents by
the Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA).
SAOVA is a nonpartisan volunteer group working to protect Americans from the legislative and political threats of radical animal rightists. It is the
only national organization fighting this struggle for both sportsmen and animal owners, natural allies, in these arenas. Visit our website at
________________________________________________________________________________
AKC has a veterinary scholarship program and also invites vet students to the
Canine Health Foundation conferences. Those students who attend
take information back to the schools, sharing what they have learned about dogs.
AKC also provides copies of dog books to upper class vet
students. Unfortunately AKC does not broadcast these efforts.
Monica Stoner
__________________________________________________________________________________
The right to breed
The state that has no business in the bedrooms of the nation
seeks to insert itself into the fallopian tubes of its poodles
*Catherine McMillan, National Post *
I still recall my first visit to the Small Animal Clinic at
the Western College of Veterinary Medicine in Saskatoon. As the young resident
took down my
puppy's health history, she advised that if I spayed my little dog before her
first heat cycle, the risk of mammary cancer could be eliminated. "Good
to know," I replied. "But how will that affect her future as my foundation
bitch?"
Some 25-plus years later, "Peras" has hundreds of champion
descendants across six continents, while I am quite likely the first and only
commercial artist to co-author a peer-reviewed paper for the American Journal of
Veterinary Ophthalmology.
That young resident's words were a warning, though I didn't
know it at the time. Veterinary medicine, once an equal partner with breeders,
sportsmen, and food producers, is being transformed by an activist reduces
owners to "guardians" and elevates health providers to the
self-appointed role of animal "advocate."
"Spay and neuter" has achieved cult mantra. Dog breeders are
held in suspicion: The only good dog is the "natural" one. Defects are blamed on
breed standards, despite the fact that the majority of purebreds are produced by
family pets and commercial breeders, their puppies as far
removed from the show ring as a second-hand pickup from the Formula One track.
This attitude is reflected by provincial boards that recently
have moved to impose bans on ear cropping and tail docking. Though long the
subject
of
some controversy, these procedures serve both aesthetic and practical ends,
injury prevention and hygiene among them.
This current turf war over puppy tails is just a preview of
coming attractions. The state that has no business in the bedrooms of the nation
seeks to
insert itself into the fallopian tubes of its poodles.
A Canadian Kennel Club (CKC) director recently recounted the
hostile atmosphere at a recent meeting with the Canadian Veterinary Medical
Association (CVMA): "These vets are not only speaking of cropping and docking.
Several, led by New Brunswick, are openly critical of the CKC's
breed standards, feel that breeders are poorly educated with respect to health,
genetics and breeding practices to support an animal's welfare and
are censorious of breeders -- in particular those breeders who breed
conformation dogs for show. They are criticizing our standards for individual
breeds and are of the opinion that we are not supporting the puppy purchasers
with healthy dogs."
To achieve this, they hint at legislation. After all, who
better to condemn the docking of a puppy's tail than the person who will, in a
few weeks time,
slice open her abdomen to remove a healthy uterus? Who better to seek
criminalization of ear cropping than a profession that declaws kittens for
profit?
For as often as they're consulted by media and policy makers
on matters canine, a veterinarian receives no training in basic breed
identification,
much less the diverse origins and forces that shape gene pools. It's
unreasonable to expect them to -- it takes a lifetime of study to master a
single
breed, much less hundreds.
The film Best in Show presented the dog-show circuit as a
caravan of loopy narcissists. Omitted from the script were the contributions of
the fancy
to everyday canine society -- rescue efforts, training classes, consumer advice,
the millions raised, the efforts donated to health research. There is
no profit in showing dogs, for costs quickly negate the returns. It's an
esoteric pursuit, driven by love of breed, competitive reward, and that
appreciation of form and symmetry shared by all artists, a thing we know as
"beauty." The Doberman's "look of eagles," the merle collie's loud and
luxurious coat, the silhouette of the Skipperke -- those things that fill the
eye can determine the fate of breeds, for it is their beauty that so often
attracts and inspires human beings to devote resources to their perpetuation.
The distance between a breed and extinction is five years,
for this is the average reproductive lifespan of a female. For rare breeds and
those with
limited genetic diversity, it takes only one ill-conceived edict on the part of
policy makers to start it down the road to collapse.
It seems like a small thing, this battle for a veterinarian'
s liberty to practice as he sees fit, a dog breeder's quest for perfection.
After all, no one
needs to crop ears on a Boxer. But then again, no one needs a Boxer at all, or
any sort of pet. Purebreds (of all species) carry health risks derived
from their genetic founding fathers. Breeds weren't created to compile longevity
records, but to perform tasks for mankind -- to dispatch vermin,
predators, and enemy barbarians, locate game, retrieve over water, to pull
sleds, or warm a dowager's bed on a cold winter night. And so, they
remain imperfect.
The Borzoi is living history of czarist Russia, the giant
Mastiff a modern echo of ancient Rome -- but they suffer high rates of bloat.
Poster artists
recruited the English bulldog as a symbol of resolve in World War II, but the
massive head that encouraged a nation results in caesarian sections.
The Dalmatian's spots are beloved of Disney and children everywhere, but the
genetics that create them can result in deafness. The merry spaniel
can wag an undocked tail to bloody pulp, but no one hunts woodcock in these
parts. Better no cocker, they say, than no tail.
Like so many other small things in this brave new humane
world -- history, property rights, individual liberty, and the beholder's
permission to
declare something "beautiful" -- the eradication of the purebred dog is
underway, aided and abetted by those we once considered friends. And yet,
to
this breeder at least, so seldom has one small thing carried with it such
symbolism for what it is we are allowing them to destroy. There is an air
of
nihilism in what they do. Like "green" zealots who insist millions will die from
climate change unless we reduce the earth's population by billions,
their ideological sisters in veterinary activism would solve the problems of
purebred dogs by eliminating them altogether. They seem oddly
disconnected from the reality that for veterinary medicine to survive, the
patient must reproduce.
- Catherine McMillan lives in Saskatchewan and runs the blog
"Small Dead Animals." In 2009, Miniature Schnauzers descending from her
"Minuteman" kennel line include those ranked #1 in the breed in the USA, Canada,
Brazil and England, along with the #2 MS in Australia and the
Jr. World Winner at the World Show in Slovakia.
___________________________________________________
I decided to voice my opinions on the things brought up in the above article. I
see nothing wrong with tail docking. It is done at 3 or 4 days old when
a puppy doesn’t have much feeling in their tail yet, and it heals very quickly.
Tail
docking is most often performed in puppies to prevent tail damage
in certain breeds, for hygiene reasons and to comply with specific breed
standards.
In my opinion ear cropping is just for cosmetic reasons.
There may be a time when it served more of a purpose and maybe for some breeds
it still
does but ear cropping is most often performed to comply with standards for
various breeds. Several breeds either require ear cropping or accept
cropped ears in the show ring. Whether or not to have the ears cropped, however,
is a personal decision. People do a lot of things to themselves
for cosmetic reasons, lipo-suction, tummy tucks face lifts and many other
things. If we do these things to ourselves to make us look better what
is the harm in making our dogs look better also. Some breeds of dogs would not
be recognized if you didn’t crop the ears.
I believe as a whole that most breeds have improved over the years. Look at the
Golden Retrievers now compared to a few years ago. However I
also believe that is not the case with all breeds. I don’t believe we should
strive to get heads so big that our dogs (such as the Bulldogs) have to
have a
caesarian sections in order to have their puppies. I also don’t like what has
happened to the German Shepherd. They look deformed to me,
crippled. If breeders would stop and think about these things before we breed
then maybe these animal rights groups would leave us alone.
As I said previously, these are my opinions and do not reflect the opinions of
this club or anyone else. If you have an opinion you would like
published in the newsletter please e-mail it to me.
Sandra McCurry
Newsletter-Sandra McCurry
southforkgoldens@aol.com

|